COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION EMISSIONS AMONG MAJOR SMARTPHONE BRANDS

Authors

Keywords:

Radiation, Radio-frequency, Smartphones, Spectrum Analyzer, Human health

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of radiofrequency (RF) radiation emissions from major smartphone brands, focusing on measured RF power and power density. A dataset was formulated by measuring RF power emissions from randomly selected eleven (11) smartphones from different brand at distance of 5 mm using a handheld spectrum analyzer. Tecno Camon has the highest power density of 2.0753 nW/cm2 and Gionee F103 has the lowest power density of 0.4991 nW/cm2. All tested smartphones meet the safety standards set by regulatory bodies Federal Communications Commission (FCC) of 1.0 mW/cm2 and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The outcomes of this research will guide public in making informed decisions regarding smartphone usage and radiation safety.

Dimensions

Adejoh, M., Ojo, J. S., & Ajewole, M. O. (2020). Assessment of electromagnetic field radiation exposure levels in Nigerian urban centers. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 13(1), 235–243.

Ajao, L. A., Bello, A. M., & Yusuf, O. A. (2021). Mobile phone penetration and health risks awareness among Nigerian users. Nigerian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 15(2), 78–84.

Anonymous (2019). Wikipedia. Spectrum Analyzer. Retrieved July 25, 2019, from http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrum_analyzer.

ARPANSA (2014). Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, Report by the ARPANSA Radiofrequency Expert Panel on Review Radiofrequency Health Effects Research - Scientific Literature 2000-2012, ARPANSA Technical Report, No 164.

ARPANSA (2019). Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency: Radiofrequency radiation, retrieved May 16, 2019, from www.arpansa.gov.au/understanding-radiation/what-is-radiation/non-ionisingradiation/radiofrequency-radiation 25

Ayeni, A. O., Fapohunda, A., & Salako, K. A. (2019). RF compliance of mobile phones sold in Nigeria: A review. International Journal of Electromagnetic Safety, 7(1), 41–47.

Bamgbose, J., Afolabi, A., & Ishola, T. (2023). Electromagnetic radiation regulation in Nigeria: Challenges and opportunities. African Journal of Regulatory Studies, 2(1), 1–12.

Bello I. A., Kure, N. Isaac, H. D., Emmanuel, J. A., Obichile, E. N. and Yunusa, F. (2021). Power Density Measurement around Kaduna North Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria. Physics Access 1(2): 1 - 4. Published by Department of Physics, Kaduna State University. ISSN: 2756 - 3898.

Dasdag, S., & Akdag, M. Z. (2016). The link between radiofrequency exposure and oxidative stress in mobile phone users. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 35(2), 109–120.

Ezenwaji, E. E., Otti, V. I., & Agu, K. O. (2021). Radiofrequency propagation in Nigerian climate zones: Implications for network planning. International Journal of Wireless Communications, 9(3), 91–100.

Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (2020). Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) testing for mobile phones. Retrieved from https://www.fcc.gov

Fernández, C., Martínez-Búrdalo, M., & Martín, A. (2019). Comparison of SAR and power density in 4G and 5G smartphones. IEEE Access, 7, 72072–72084.

Guowang M., Jens Z., Ki Won S., and Ben S. (2016) Fundamentals Mobile Data Networks, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 1107143217, 2016 Magaret R. (2019). Search Mobile Computing Retrieved July 24, 2019, from www.searchmobilecomputing.techtarget.com/definition/SIM-card

Hardell, L., & Carlberg, M. (2015). Mobile phones, brain tumors, and the precautionary principle. International Journal of Oncology, 46(5), 1865–1871.

ICNIRP. (2020). Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Physics, 118(5), 483–524.

Kumar, N., et al. (2014). SAR and power output analysis of smartphones in the Indian market. Bioelectromagnetics, 35(4), 273–282.

Kwan-Hoong N. (2003). "Non-Ionizing Radiations – Sources, Biological Effects, Emissions, and Exposures". Proceedings of the International Conference on Non-Ionizing Radiation at UNITEN ICNIR2003 Electromagnetic Fields and Our Health.

Kwee S., and Rashmark P. (1995). Changes in cell proliferation due to environmental non-ionizing radiation 1. ELF electromagnetic fields, Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg., 36:109-114

Lönn S., Forssén U., Vecchia P., Ahlbom A., Feychting M. (2004) Output power levels from mobile phones in different geographical areas; implications for exposure assessment. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2004; 61(9):769-772.

Magaret R. (2014). Whatis.com Retrieved July 24, 2019 fromwww.whatis.techtarget.com/definition/base-station

Meo, S. A., et al. (2019). Mobile phone use and subjective symptoms: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(12), 2133.

NCC (Nigerian Communications Commission). (2021). Annual report on mobile usage and RF exposure standards in Nigeria. NCC Publications, Abuja.

Olisah, C., Etim, U., & Olamide, T. (2022). Consumer preferences and health considerations in smartphone purchases in Nigeria. African Journal of Technology and Society, 3(1), 44–53.

Olowookere, E. O., Okeowo, O. P., & Akanbi, T. (2020). Awareness and perceptions of EMF exposure among university students. Journal of Public Health in Africa, 11(1), 133–140.

Onyeonoru, I. P., & Aina, T. O. (2022). Policy gaps in radiation safety in Nigeria's ICT sector. Nigerian Journal of Policy Studies, 6(2), 102–118.

Redmayne, M., & Johansson, O. (2014). Could EMF exposure from mobile phones explain increasing brain tumor incidence? Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 33(2), 187–191.

SCENIHR (2015). Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks: Potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) retrieved August 15, 2015, from http://www.ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/docs/scenihr_o_0 41.pdf.Exit

Statista (2016). Mobile phone users worldwide 2015-2020. Retrieved May 16, 2019, from www.statista.com/274774/forecast-of-mobile-phone-users-worldwide/

Sultan, A., Saidu, M., & Yaduma, J. (2015). Radiofrequency radiation and human exposure: A Nigerian perspective. Journal of Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 5(1), 17–24

Volkow N. D., Tomasi D, Wang G. J. (2011). Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism. JAMA. 2011;305(8):808-813.

WHO (2019). World Health Organization: Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones retrieved July 5, 2019, from: www.who.int./news-room/factsheet/detail/electromagnetic-fields-and-public-health-mobile-phones

Published

17-09-2025

How to Cite

Vatsa, M. A., Bello, I. A., Garba, N. N., Soje, A. A., Suleiman, A., & Abbas, A. M. (2025). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION EMISSIONS AMONG MAJOR SMARTPHONE BRANDS. FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES, 9(9), 139-143. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2025-0909-3995

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 9 (2025): FUDMA Journal of Sciences - Vol. 9 No. 9

Section

Research Articles
Copyright & Licensing

Copyright (c) 2025 FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Vatsa, M. A., Bello, I. A., Garba, N. N., Soje, A. A., Suleiman, A., & Abbas, A. M. (2025). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION EMISSIONS AMONG MAJOR SMARTPHONE BRANDS. FUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES, 9(9), 139-143. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2025-0909-3995

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2